2003
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-03-06925-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A version of Burkholder’s theorem for operator-weighted spaces

Abstract: Abstract. Let W be an operator weight, i.e. a weight function taking values in the bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space H. We prove that if the dyadic martingale transforms are uniformly bounded on L 2 R (W ) for each dyadic grid in R, then the Hilbert transform is bounded on L 2 R (W ) as well, thus providing an analogue of Burkholder's theorem for operator-weighted L 2 -spaces. We also give a short new proof of Burkholder's theorem itself. Our proof is based on the decomposition of the Hilbert transfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They showed W satisfying (3) no longer implies that the Hilbert transform or Haar multipliers are bounded on L 2 (W ). In [31], Petermichl-Pott proved a form of Burkholder's Theorem, connecting the boundedness of the Haar multipliers with that of the Hilbert transform on operator weighted L 2 spaces. In [15,33], Pott and Katz-Pereyra both provided interesting sufficient conditions for the Hilbert transform to be bounded on operator weighted L 2 , but to the best of the authors' knowledge, necessary and sufficient conditions have proved elusive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed W satisfying (3) no longer implies that the Hilbert transform or Haar multipliers are bounded on L 2 (W ). In [31], Petermichl-Pott proved a form of Burkholder's Theorem, connecting the boundedness of the Haar multipliers with that of the Hilbert transform on operator weighted L 2 spaces. In [15,33], Pott and Katz-Pereyra both provided interesting sufficient conditions for the Hilbert transform to be bounded on operator weighted L 2 , but to the best of the authors' knowledge, necessary and sufficient conditions have proved elusive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%