1991
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(91)90118-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A versatile programmable CAMAC random pulse generator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…- (24).Of them,some were realized by using noises from electronic devices(12), (13), (15), (16), (18), (22).Others were built by using logic hardware (14), (17), (19), (21), (24).The rest utilize computers (23)or light emission (20 In the following section,we describe the fundamental construction scheme and the randomness of the pulser as well as the performance of it when operated with the mode of time-dependent rate,and the application example of the pulser to a partial discharge pulse train(10),(11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…- (24).Of them,some were realized by using noises from electronic devices(12), (13), (15), (16), (18), (22).Others were built by using logic hardware (14), (17), (19), (21), (24).The rest utilize computers (23)or light emission (20 In the following section,we describe the fundamental construction scheme and the randomness of the pulser as well as the performance of it when operated with the mode of time-dependent rate,and the application example of the pulser to a partial discharge pulse train(10),(11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One type of the RPs utilizes physical sources such as an avalanche noise in a p-n junction(2),(6)-(9),(12),(13),(15),(16), (23) thermal noise (27), (28) or signals delivered from a photon counting unit(11),(17) Another type makes use of an artificial randomness, namely an algorithm consisting of an LFSR(Linear Feedback Shift Register) which can generate a PRBS(Pseudo Random Bit Sequence)(1),(5),(20), (21), (24)- (26), (29)- (34) or the algorithm(10), (35), (36) different from the LFSR.…”
Section: Introducitonmentioning
confidence: 99%