2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Versatile Gene-Based Test for Genome-wide Association Studies

Abstract: We have derived a versatile gene-based test for genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Our approach, called VEGAS (versatile gene-based association study), is applicable to all GWAS designs, including family-based GWAS, meta-analyses of GWAS on the basis of summary data, and DNA-pooling-based GWAS, where existing approaches based on permutation are not possible, as well as singleton data, where they are. The test incorporates information from a full set of markers (or a defined subset) within a gene and accou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
915
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 757 publications
(921 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
915
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genomewide gene‐based tests which account for both gene length and LD between SNPs were performed by vegas 0.8.27 (Versatile Gene‐Based Association Study) (Liu et al ., 2010) using SNP P ‐value results from the overall meta‐analyses. SNPs were allocated to one or more autosomal genes using gene boundaries ±50 kb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomewide gene‐based tests which account for both gene length and LD between SNPs were performed by vegas 0.8.27 (Versatile Gene‐Based Association Study) (Liu et al ., 2010) using SNP P ‐value results from the overall meta‐analyses. SNPs were allocated to one or more autosomal genes using gene boundaries ±50 kb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a second pathway analysis approach (GSEA‐VEGAS) to verify any associated sets as follows. We calculated gene‐level association statistics for all genes using VEGAS56 and then calculated a gene‐set enrichment statistic for each of the pathways. We calculated an empirical p value by sampling random gene sets with the same number of genes as the tested pathway and compared GSEA‐enrichment statistics between the simulated and tested pathways.…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New Analysis Methodology Underpinning New Discovery GWAS data have led to new analysis methods that fall into a number of categories depending on their purpose: (1) methods of better modeling population structure and relatedness between individuals in a sample during association analyses, [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] (2) methods of detecting novel variants and gene loci on the basis of GWAS summary statistics, [35][36][37] (3) methods of estimating and partitioning genetic (co)variance, 38,39 and (4) methods of inferring causality. [40][41][42] In addition, GWAS discoveries and interpretation have benefited substantially from improved algorithms in statistical imputation of unobserved genotypes and statistical imputation of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes and amino acid polymorphisms.…”
Section: Pleiotropy Is Pervasivementioning
confidence: 99%