Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19447-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A versatile and customizable low-cost 3D-printed open standard for microscopic imaging

Abstract: Modern microscopes used for biological imaging often present themselves as black boxes whose precise operating principle remains unknown, and whose optical resolution and price seem to be in inverse proportion to each other. With UC2 (You. See. Too.) we present a low-cost, 3D-printed, open-source, modular microscopy toolbox and demonstrate its versatility by realizing a complete microscope development cycle from concept to experimental phase. The self-contained incubator-enclosed brightfield microscope monitor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This simplifies development and building of optical systems, since modules with optical functionality can then just be stacked. The original UC2 system, which is described in detail in [13], relies entirely on 3D printed cubes that host a variety of different optical components with the help of customized inserts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This simplifies development and building of optical systems, since modules with optical functionality can then just be stacked. The original UC2 system, which is described in detail in [13], relies entirely on 3D printed cubes that host a variety of different optical components with the help of customized inserts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The printing and assembly time of the modules becomes an issue especially during upscaling towards multiple parallel setups. Furthermore, the designs presented in our previous publication [13] suffer from slight differences in scale between different 3D-printers with the stability and reproducibility depending also on the choice of the printing material.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2). These characteristics enable systems such as miCube (13), the UC2 (14), and the the Warwick Open Source Microscope (WOSM) (https://wosmic.org), where further customisation is possible due to their modular design. The microscope parts that can be built vary with the technology and materials available.…”
Section: D Printing In Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%