2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Verification Method for Collaborative Business Processes

Abstract: The verification of collaborative processes is a key issue to consider in cross-organizational modeling methodologies. Some of the existing verification approaches provide only partial support, whereas others impose some restrictions to verify models with advanced control flow, compromise (completely or partially) the enterprise autonomy, or are focused on technology-dependent specifications. In order to deal with these issues we introduce Global Interaction Nets, which are based on Hierarchical and Colored Pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies that try to characterise inter-organisational soundness are available [5,31]. However, differently from our work, these approaches do not apply to BPMN, which is the modelling notation aimed by our study.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Other studies that try to characterise inter-organisational soundness are available [5,31]. However, differently from our work, these approaches do not apply to BPMN, which is the modelling notation aimed by our study.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The approach was used to obtain a global workflow modelled using Inter-Organizational Workflow (IOWF), which was then transform into a WF-net and verify its soundness property. Similarly, Jorge Roa et al [8] propose a verification method -Global Interaction Net (GI-Net) based on Hierarchical and Coloured Petri Net (HCP-Net) to formalize CBP model in UP-ColBPIP, then use CPN tools (Coloured Petri Nets) to verify the Global Interaction soundness property. Their approach was able to support advanced control flow issues like advanced synchronisations, exemption management and cancellation regions, which was not supported in [7].…”
Section: Collaborative Business Process Verification Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their approach was able to support advanced control flow issues like advanced synchronisations, exemption management and cancellation regions, which was not supported in [7]. Roa et al [8] proposed method is independent of the semantics and can be used with any modelling language for CBP. Though, the model must be structured (i.e.…”
Section: Collaborative Business Process Verification Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the work take a model-checking approach, where the system under verification is represented as a kind of automaton or Petri Nets. An example that explicitly addresses collaborative business processes is [23], which however does not cover liveness properties. Live Sequence Charts (LSCs) [6] is a conservative extension of Message Sequence Charts allowing to distinguish possible (may) from required (must) behaviour, and thus the specification of liveness properties.…”
Section: Fig 2 Live Delivery With MI Sub-processmentioning
confidence: 99%