31st Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2005. IECON 2005. 2005
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2005.1569202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A velocity measurement method for acceleration control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It counts the number of pulses n P from the encoder during a fixed sampling period s T and calculates velocity by finite difference derivative. Following equation (3) shows the formulation of M-method [17]:…”
Section: Noise Free Velocity Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It counts the number of pulses n P from the encoder during a fixed sampling period s T and calculates velocity by finite difference derivative. Following equation (3) shows the formulation of M-method [17]:…”
Section: Noise Free Velocity Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Comparison of the theoretical resolution of our method with four other methods: 1) the M method (simple encoder pulses measurement in a fixed sampling period); 2) the T method (simple period measurement -division of interpulse angle by the pulse interval time); 3) the M/T method; and 4) the S method [4]. the 10-ns range and with 400 ps per channel resolution, the number of usable channels is 25.…”
Section: Error Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 4 gives the measurement resolution for the following five methods: 1) the M method (simple encoder pulses measurement in a fixed sampling period); 2) the T method (simple period measurement, i.e., division of interpulse angle by the pulse interval time); 3) the M/T method; 4) the S method described in [4]; 5) our method.…”
Section: Error Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations