2005
DOI: 10.1007/11430919_47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Vector Field Visualization Technique for Self-organizing Maps

Abstract: Abstract. The Self-Organizing Map is one of most prominent tools for the analysis and visualization of high-dimensional data. We propose a novel visualization technique for Self-Organizing Maps which can be displayed either as a vector field where arrows point to cluster centers, or as a plot that stresses cluster borders. A parameter is provided that allows for visualization of the cluster structure at different levels of detail. Furthermore, we present a number of experimental results using standard data min… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Comparison of quantization error needs to be under the same grid size. [18]. To determine the optimal grid size we use the approach by Vesanto [19]: G = 5 ∗ sqrt ( N ), where N is the size of the input data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Comparison of quantization error needs to be under the same grid size. [18]. To determine the optimal grid size we use the approach by Vesanto [19]: G = 5 ∗ sqrt ( N ), where N is the size of the input data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training of a SOM is a stochastic approximation process, thus usually several maps need to be built and the best one is selected. A big variety of measures for the goodness of mapping has been proposed, , but there is still no uniformly recognized method to evaluate the quality of a particular SOM. Thus, in the following experiments with single structure representation ten SOMs were trained, and the obtained ranked lists were merged using eq 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity tests were based on the quantization error (QE), measuring how much detail is being learned by the SOMs, and on the topological error (TE), measuring the properties of the preserved space and the variation percentage of each pattern. This empirical procedure depends intrinsically on the study (Polzlbauer, 2004). We determined the optimal number of patterns by quantifying the associated QE and TE errors through various tests using different cluster arrangements, including 2 × 2, 2 × 3, 3 × 3, 3 × 4, and 4 × 4.…”
Section: Self-organizing Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%