2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.17.452746
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A vast evolutionarily transient translatome contributes to phenotype and fitness

Abstract: Ribosome profiling experiments demonstrate widespread translation of eukaryotic genomes outside of annotated protein-coding genes. However, it is unclear how much of this "noncanonical" translation contributes biologically relevant microproteins rather than insignificant translational noise. Here, we developed an integrative computational framework (iRibo) that leverages hundreds of ribosome profiling experiments to detect signatures of translation with high sensitivity and specificity. We deployed iRibo to co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(247 reference statements)
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some sORFs encode functional small proteins that contribute to cell fitness, whereas other sORFs function as cis -acting regulators. In eukaryotes, there have been reports of ‘pervasive translation’ of thousands of unannotated sORFs, likely due to the imperfect specificity of the translation machinery ( Ingolia et al, 2014 ; Ruiz-Orera et al, 2018 ; Wacholder et al, 2021 ). The function, if any, of these sORFs and their encoded proteins is unclear, although they are rarely subject to purifying selection ( Ruiz-Orera et al, 2018 ; Wacholder et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some sORFs encode functional small proteins that contribute to cell fitness, whereas other sORFs function as cis -acting regulators. In eukaryotes, there have been reports of ‘pervasive translation’ of thousands of unannotated sORFs, likely due to the imperfect specificity of the translation machinery ( Ingolia et al, 2014 ; Ruiz-Orera et al, 2018 ; Wacholder et al, 2021 ). The function, if any, of these sORFs and their encoded proteins is unclear, although they are rarely subject to purifying selection ( Ruiz-Orera et al, 2018 ; Wacholder et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In eukaryotes, there have been reports of ‘pervasive translation’ of thousands of unannotated sORFs, likely due to the imperfect specificity of the translation machinery ( Ingolia et al, 2014 ; Ruiz-Orera et al, 2018 ; Wacholder et al, 2021 ). The function, if any, of these sORFs and their encoded proteins is unclear, although they are rarely subject to purifying selection ( Ruiz-Orera et al, 2018 ; Wacholder et al, 2021 ). Nonetheless, pervasively translated eukaryotic sORFs may function as ‘proto-genes’, that, over the course of evolution, can acquire a function promoting cell fitness, a process referred to as ‘de novo gene birth’ ( Blevins et al, 2021 ; Carvunis et al, 2012 ; Ruiz-Orera et al, 2018 ; Vakirlis et al, 2018 ; Vakirlis et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accomplish this, all reads were shifted such that a read pattern of triplet periodicity corresponded to the coding sequence of annotated genes, as described in Malone et al 2017 [ 41 ]. The significance of triplet periodicity of Ribo-seq reads was then assessed for the SPAAR ORF in each tissue using the method described in Wacholder et al [ 16 ]. For each codon, the position within the codon that had the most reads was determined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The x -axis corresponds to each position in the 237 bp long SPAAR ORF in the platypus, with 1 as the first position. Reads in each platypus tissue show significant triplet periodicity by a binomial test [ 16 ], with a preference for aligning to the first codon position shown in black lines.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation