2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.spasta.2019.100365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A variational method for parameter estimation in a logistic spatial regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To do the comparison, the measurements to be used are the estimates value and MSE. These measures are also used in a similar comparison study for variational method by Hardouin [17]. The two measures are the easiest indication of how good the estimates are [2].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To do the comparison, the measurements to be used are the estimates value and MSE. These measures are also used in a similar comparison study for variational method by Hardouin [17]. The two measures are the easiest indication of how good the estimates are [2].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two measures are the easiest indication of how good the estimates are [2]. In addition, the average of squared differences between the true parameters value and the estimates is used following [17] and [19] in order to analyze the consistency of the estimate's quality. Lastly, to study the closeness of the parameter estimates, graphical representations of the value estimates for the two methods are also used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pfarrhofer and Piribauer (2019) proposed two shrinkage priors to make Bayesian variable selection for high-dimensional spatial autoregressive models. Hardouin (2019) proposed a variational bayesian method to estimate the logistic spatial regression. Wang and Tang (2020) considered Bayesian inference on a quantile regression model in the presence of nonignorable missing covariates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%