2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-011-9874-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Variance-Expected Compliance Model for Structural Optimization

Abstract: In this paper, we first remember the mathematical formulation of an original variance-expected compliance model used for structural optimization. It allows us to find robust structures for the main load and its perturbations. In the second part, we valid this model on a 3-D benchmark test case and compare the results obtained to those given by a classical expected compliance model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can also be deduced by observing the shape of both solutions (see Figures 3-4): the density distribution ρ sp is concentrated in the X-Z plane including f , producing a good resistance to the main load, whereas ρ ec exhibits four pillars resilient to the perturbed loads included in the X-Y plane orthogonal to f . From this preliminary result, as in the truss optimization case studied in [7], we can deduce that considering formulation (10) for topology optimization can help to generate structures robust to perturbations of the main load.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This can also be deduced by observing the shape of both solutions (see Figures 3-4): the density distribution ρ sp is concentrated in the X-Z plane including f , producing a good resistance to the main load, whereas ρ ec exhibits four pillars resilient to the perturbed loads included in the X-Y plane orthogonal to f . From this preliminary result, as in the truss optimization case studied in [7], we can deduce that considering formulation (10) for topology optimization can help to generate structures robust to perturbations of the main load.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We have adapted an expected compliance formulation, coming from truss design (see [3,7]), to topology optimization. We have exhibited, in a particular case, an explicit expression easy to evaluate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In an analogous way to previous stochastic results for truss optimization (see [8,9,10] and the next section), we assume that the external load force…”
Section: Remark 1 In This Work It Is Possible To Include Functions Lementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other direction, Allaire (see [13]) proposes a deterministic method for optimizing a structure with respect to its worst possible behavior. Similarly to the case of trusses (see [10]) this approach provides solutions which are robust under load perturbations, but for some particular scenarios it may happen that the value of the compliance is too large and this model is no suitable. In order to avoid this situation we propose the following alternative.…”
Section: Remark 2 Similarly Whenmentioning
confidence: 99%