2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.03.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A variable iterated greedy algorithm for the traveling salesman problem with time windows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial population procedure aims to generate diversified solutions with good quality. Specifically, in order to obtain an initial solution S, which consists of several routes, we present a random greedy construction method inspired from the iterated greedy construction procedure in [24] given as follows:…”
Section: Initial Population Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial population procedure aims to generate diversified solutions with good quality. Specifically, in order to obtain an initial solution S, which consists of several routes, we present a random greedy construction method inspired from the iterated greedy construction procedure in [24] given as follows:…”
Section: Initial Population Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given any solution s, the basic structure of procedure Two Route Exchange (s) is an extension to the variable iterated greedy algorithm for a TSPTW in Karabulut and Tasgetiren (2014). That is, given each pair of different routes in the solution s, a Two Route Destruct Construct (k 1 ,k 2 ) procedure similar to the Destruct Construct () in Karabulut and Tasgetiren (2014) is applied to exchange k 1 number of customers from route one with the k 2 number of customers from route two in order to generate two new routes. The two new routes are treated as independent TSPTW problems and are optimised using the VNS_1_Opt local search of Karabulut and Tasgetiren (2014).…”
Section: Local Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also consider the FFO algorithm (namely, nFFO) presented for the semiconductor final testing scheduling problem in Zheng et al [32], the multi-restart iterated local search of Dong et al (ILSD for short, where the capital letter D is taken from authors' name) [24] for the permutation flowshop problem, and the variable iterated greedy (vIG) for the traveling salesman problem with time windows by Karaulut and Tasgetiren [52]. We change the way that the makespan is calculated by the one shown in Section 4.1.1 for the above adapted algorithms.…”
Section: Computational Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%