1971
DOI: 10.1109/proc.1971.8130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A variable-coverage satellite antenna system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 resembles the classical and metamaterial metallic lenses. 10,[21][22][23][24][25] However, it must be noted that the underlying physics is completely different. The waveguides suggested here have a very small volume fraction in a unit cell, and owing to the fact that they are designed to operate near the cutoff frequency, they behave as an ENZ structure and therefore the phase distribution within each waveguide is indeed nearly uniform.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 resembles the classical and metamaterial metallic lenses. 10,[21][22][23][24][25] However, it must be noted that the underlying physics is completely different. The waveguides suggested here have a very small volume fraction in a unit cell, and owing to the fact that they are designed to operate near the cutoff frequency, they behave as an ENZ structure and therefore the phase distribution within each waveguide is indeed nearly uniform.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 10.39, the stack is the same size as the array, and is roughly one free-space wavelength thick; a voltage gradient is applied across the metal strips to scan the beam in the E-plane. Such a lens is shown in Figure 10.40 (Dion and Ricardi, 1971). In the second scheme, a similar stack of metal strips is close to the array face, but the dielectric plates have been replaced by an array of diodes.…”
Section: Other Lensesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "current" beamforming phases for the competing strategies are so that the techniques have the same set of active worst-case ground stations. Thus, one only needs to consider the functional gradients as in (6). Assume, for simplicity, that there are no additional SL constraints.…”
Section: Analysis Of Approximated Beam Addition Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume, for simplicity, that there are no additional SL constraints. From (6) and (9), the operating point satisfies the first-order necessary conditions for a local solution if (25) Using (24), the corresponding relation for the approximate beam-addition technique is (26) By inspection, if an operating point is optimal so that (25) is satisfied, then (26) is satisfied. This shows that a true local solution appears as a solution for the approximated beam addition technique.…”
Section: Analysis Of Approximated Beam Addition Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%