2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02492-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Valveless Pulsatile Pump for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Hemo- and Fluid Dynamic Feasibility

Abstract: Treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a major unmet medical need. An implantable valveless pulsatile pump with a single cannula—the CoPulse pump—may provide beneficial hemodynamic support for select HFpEF patients when connected to the failing ventricle. We aimed to demonstrate hemodynamic efficacy and hemocompatible design feasibility for this novel assist device. The hemodynamic effect of the pump was investigated with an in vitro circulatory mock loop and an ex vivo iso… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Maximum Re in the ventricle chamber, based on a flow rate given by motion of the atrioventricular plane piston, was 1740. Two-equation turbulence models, such as the SST k-ω model, sometimes chosen for artificial hearts, 19,28 are parameterized for fully turbulent flows and so are not necessarily better than a laminar assumption 16 which is chosen by other authors. 21,29,30 This can be seen in the results from the FDA CFD Benchmark medical device study, 31 in which the two-equation turbulence models gave good velocity predictions in some regions, but in other regions the laminar assumption gave better velocity predictions, and for several cases, the laminar assumption gave better pressure predictions.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Maximum Re in the ventricle chamber, based on a flow rate given by motion of the atrioventricular plane piston, was 1740. Two-equation turbulence models, such as the SST k-ω model, sometimes chosen for artificial hearts, 19,28 are parameterized for fully turbulent flows and so are not necessarily better than a laminar assumption 16 which is chosen by other authors. 21,29,30 This can be seen in the results from the FDA CFD Benchmark medical device study, 31 in which the two-equation turbulence models gave good velocity predictions in some regions, but in other regions the laminar assumption gave better velocity predictions, and for several cases, the laminar assumption gave better pressure predictions.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of HFrEF MCS devices that support the pumping action of the left ventricle is not recommended in HFpEF, due to reported risks of atrial suction and intraventricular thrombosis ( 86 , 172 , 182 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 ), analogous solutions that are specific for HFpEF are currently under development to reduce LAP, enhance LV filling, and restore cardiac output. In this context, a variety of in silico and in vitro studies have been conducted on a number of proposed approaches to investigate their feasibility ( 22 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 ). To date, however, animal experimentation for MCS for HFpEF remains minimal, and no clinical testing has yet been conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design and feasibility of a valveless pulsatile pump (CoPulse) for the treatment of HFpEF were recently described by Granegger et al ( 175 ) and Escher et al ( 176 ). Designed for implantation at the apex of the heart, the CoPulse device is composed of 1 blood chamber and 1 air chamber divided by a flexible polyurethane membrane.…”
Section: Device-based Solutions For Hfpefmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only example of adding LV volume to the LV is the CoPulse, a valveless pulsatile pump with a single cannula connected to the LV apex [33,34]. This pump can add around 30 mL to each LV stroke volume with the pump chamber and create pulsatile flow synchronized with the LV cardiac cycle by using the LV pressure as a signal.…”
Section: Approaching To Lv: To Enlarge LV Relaxation/lv Volumementioning
confidence: 99%