A value-based monitoring system to support heritage conservation planning

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to presents a conceptual framework for a value-based monitoring system that serves as the core element for heritage conservation planning of World Heritage Sites. It reports on the early stage of heritage management research within the PRECOM3OS framework, in collaboration with the University of Leuven in Belgium and the Universidad de Cuenca in Ecuador. A new management concept was developed throughout a five-year interdisciplinary and multi-actor growth process within an international setting. Design/methodology/approach – The application of the preventive conservation approach to world heritage management places the concepts of authenticity and integrity at the core of the heritage monitoring system. Moreover, the monitoring system is converted into a decision support tool for intervention and maintenance planning, beyond the mere purpose of inventorying or generating alerts. Findings – The regular update of information for condition, risks and value assessment strengths and support strategic heritage planning. The conceptual information system developed is based on an inventory system and updated through monitoring. Therefore, planners are supplied with a tool for alternative scenarios, potential prioritization of intervention, options for preventive conservation and multi-criteria support for strategic planning over time. Research limitations/implications – The monitoring system is not fully implemented in the World Heritage Site of Cuenca; however, a generic model is put forward, developed to generate a planning tool that can be applied for different heritage sites. Originality/value – More specific, the integration of two concepts: the value assessment and monitoring from a preventive conservation perspective is considered an innovative contribution to the development of decision-making systems in the broader urban planning context of historic cities.

The importance of museums in the tourist development and the motivations of their visitors: an analysis of the Costume Museum in Viana do Castelo

“…Tourism, as an area of study, has expanded its scope, reflecting an increasing recognition in the academic community paralleled by the application of interdisciplinary concepts and methods (Sousa and Alves, 2019). Indeed, research in tourism has been studying its various implications from a multitude of perspectives and with interdisciplinary insights (Kucukusta et al , 2013a, b; Cristina Heras et al , 2013). In this context, niche tourism can be considered to be an alternative, almost antithesis to modern mass tourism (e.g.…”

When theory and practice clash: participatory governance and management in Takht-e Soleyman

“…Hence, the governance and management of rural cultural landscapes is a quite complex issue considering their characteristics, their social, cultural, economic and environmental values, the interactions of human beings with nature, as well as, the various perspectives from which the cultural landscape could be interpreted. The combinations of these factors create a value system (Vos and Meekes, 1999; Cristina Heras et al , 2013) that could be interpreted through static and dynamic approaches. The governance and management of rural cultural landscapes for sustainable development would be based on integrated approach to all values of the cultural landscape by assessments through inter- or trans-disciplinary cooperation (Palang et al , 2005; United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, 1992b).…”

Cultural heritage through the lens of COVID-19

“…In parallel with this approach, scholars and organizations have developed various typologies of heritage values that include, but not limited to, aesthetic, social, historic, age, economic, political, scientific, and ecological values ( Tarrafa Silva & Pereira Roders, 2012 ; de La Torre, 2013 ; ICOMOS Australia, 2013 ). In this framework, different quantitative and qualitative methods have been developed to assess and grasp diverse and sometimes conflicting cultural heritage values within different cultural contexts ( Heras et al, 2013 ; Lourenço-Gomes et al, 2019 ; Heredia-Carroza et al, 2020 ). Jones (2017) argued that while experts tend to focus on intrinsic historic and scientific values, the public is primarily concerned with social value.…”