A validity study of the Working Group's Orientation Test for individuals with moderate to severe intellectual disability

Pyo, Geunyeong; Curtis, Kelly L.; Curtis, R. H.; Markwell, Stephen

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01191.x

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Pyo et al [73] only looks at orientation and shows significant differences between DAT group and controls but Orientation tests alone are not reliable for diagnosis.…”

Section: Figmentioning

confidence: 99%

A critical literature review of the effectiveness of various instruments in the diagnosis of dementia in adults with intellectual disabilities

Elliott-King

Shaw

Bandelow

et al. 2016

Alz & Dem Diag Ass & Dis Mo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionCurrently, there is no consensus on dementia diagnostics in adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). There are three types of assessments available: direct cognitive tests, test batteries, and informant reports.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in four databases yielding 9840 records. Relevant studies were identified and selected using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and then coded and classified according to assessment type. This was completed by two independent researchers, with a third consulted when discrepancies arose. The review collates diagnostic instruments and presents strengths and weaknesses.ResultsOverall 47 studies met the search criteria, and 43 instruments were extracted from the selected studies. Of which, 10 instruments were classified as test batteries, 23 were classified as direct cognitive tests, and the remaining 10 were informant reports.DiscussionThis review can recommend that cognitive test batteries can offer the most practical and efficient method for dementia diagnosis in individuals with ID.

show abstract

“…Pyo et al [73] only looks at orientation and shows significant differences between DAT group and controls but Orientation tests alone are not reliable for diagnosis.…”

Section: Figmentioning

confidence: 99%

A critical literature review of the effectiveness of various instruments in the diagnosis of dementia in adults with intellectual disabilities

Elliott-King

Shaw

Bandelow

et al. 2016

Alz & Dem Diag Ass & Dis Mo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A validity study of the Working Group's Autobiographical Memory Test for individuals with moderate to severe intellectual disability

Pyo

Ala

Kyrouac

et al. 2011

Research in Developmental Disabilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A validity study of the Working Group's Orientation Test for individuals with moderate to severe intellectual disability

Abstract: Screening DAT patients based only on the score of the Orientation Test of the Working Group's Test Battery may produce a large number of diagnostic errors.

Cited by 2 publications

References 19 publications

A critical literature review of the effectiveness of various instruments in the diagnosis of dementia in adults with intellectual disabilities

A critical literature review of the effectiveness of various instruments in the diagnosis of dementia in adults with intellectual disabilities

A validity study of the Working Group's Autobiographical Memory Test for individuals with moderate to severe intellectual disability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About