2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-005-0807-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A validation study of the WHO analgesic ladder: a two-step vs three-step strategy

Abstract: Our preliminary data would seem to suggest that a direct move to the third step of the WHO analgesic ladder is feasible and could reduce some pain scores but also requires careful management of side effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(27 reference statements)
4
61
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Maltoni et al [8] evaluated the efficacy of an innovative two-step strategy for the treatment of chronic cancer pain to determine if it was more effective than the conventional three-step strategy. They reported that of the 54 patients in their study, the patients in the "two-step" group had better pain control and shorter periods of pain, but experienced more adverse effects, than the patients in the "three-step" group.…”
Section: The World Health Organization's Three-step Analgesic Laddermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maltoni et al [8] evaluated the efficacy of an innovative two-step strategy for the treatment of chronic cancer pain to determine if it was more effective than the conventional three-step strategy. They reported that of the 54 patients in their study, the patients in the "two-step" group had better pain control and shorter periods of pain, but experienced more adverse effects, than the patients in the "three-step" group.…”
Section: The World Health Organization's Three-step Analgesic Laddermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a RCT is required to be conducted for the role of 2 nd step (Marinangeli et al, 2004;Maltoni et al, 2005;.…”
Section: Who Guideline For Steps and Pharmacological Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, two randomized controlled trials demonstrated that using a Step 3 opioid first (two-step strategy) is significantly more effective than using the three-step strategy, in improving cancer pain (36,37). However, some adverse events such as nausea or constipation tended to be more frequent in the two-step strategy group in these studies.…”
Section: Patients With Moderate-to-severe Pain or Inadequately Contromentioning
confidence: 63%