A Validation Study of Ratio-Judgment Methods

Guilford, J. P.; Dingman, Harvey F.

doi:10.2307/1417932

Cited by 22 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This constant ratio property can be seen to hold-quite well in the data of Guilford and Dingman (1954 , Table I) and Warren and Warren (1956). By the above argument, therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that the Ss were fractionating and that the psychophysical relation was a power function.…”

Section: Stimulus Integrationsupporting

confidence: 59%

“…That allows a solution for a. the exponent of the power function. as in Guilford and Dingman (1954). Unfortunately, the fractionation method provides no way of testing whether w is Ih.…”

Section: Stimulus Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1958. p. 116). However, Guilford and Dingman (1954), Baker and Dudek (1955). Goude (1962), andOttander (1967) all report certain inconsistencies between the data and the model.…”

Section: Stimulus Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Cross-task validation of functional measurement

Anderson

1972

Perception & Psychophysics

159

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Stimulus Integrationsupporting

confidence: 59%

“…That allows a solution for a. the exponent of the power function. as in Guilford and Dingman (1954). Unfortunately, the fractionation method provides no way of testing whether w is Ih.…”

Section: Stimulus Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cross-task validation of functional measurement

Anderson

1972

Perception & Psychophysics

159

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Experiment 1 tested directly for the possibility of providing a metric representation of distance judgments by comparing a number of median distance scales constructed independently from different subsets of judgments. This strategy has commonly been adopted in testing the validity of scaling procedures (Chatterjea & DasGupta, 1966;Guilford & Dingman, 1954;Hanes, 1949). line fitted to the variable settings by least squares so as to pass through the origin (this time using all available measurements).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The judgment of distance on a plane surface

Cook

1978

Perception & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A test was made of the scalability of interval-ordering judgments of distance along the median path of a plane horizontal surface. Scales were derived from different subsets of judgments. It was found that scale values were related to distance by a power function with marked individual differences in exponent, but that different subsets of judgment yielded the same mean exponent. This finding was taken as positive evidence of scalability. The individual differences in judgment were shown to be reliable over a period of 3 weeks.

show abstract

“…With Dingman (Guilford & Dingman, 1954), I tested the validity of this power function by applying the method of absolute judgment to lifted weights. The law was fully supported.…”

Section: Psychophysicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Sixty-Year Perspective on Psychological I Measurement

Guilford

1985

Applied Psychological Measurement

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Editor's Note. This is the second article in our Perspective on Psychological Measurement Series. In this article J. P. Guilford, who was first exposed to the problems and methods of psychological measurement in the early 1920s, provides a unique perspective on his distinguished career ranging across his varied and very important contributions to the science of psychology and to the methodology of psychological measurement. Based upon experiences with most kinds of methods of psychological measurement, this article presents comments on a variety of uses, including psychophysics, scaling, testing, and factor analysis. Some difficulties are pointed out, some faults are mentioned, and a variety of applications are discussed, some of them unusual.

show abstract

A Validation Study of Ratio-Judgment Methods

Cited by 22 publications

References 0 publications

Cross-task validation of functional measurement

Cross-task validation of functional measurement

The judgment of distance on a plane surface

A Sixty-Year Perspective on Psychological I Measurement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About