2011
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a2844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Validation Study of Multicenter Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Reliability of Fractional Anisotropy and Diffusivity Values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
111
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
111
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DTI quantifies subtle white matter differences in normalappearing white matter on traditional MRI scans. Fractional anisotropy (FA), an index obtained through DTI, represents the degree of anisotropy, or strength of diffusion direction, of water molecules within these tracts, providing a reliable assessment of microstructural integrity of white matter fibers (Fox et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DTI quantifies subtle white matter differences in normalappearing white matter on traditional MRI scans. Fractional anisotropy (FA), an index obtained through DTI, represents the degree of anisotropy, or strength of diffusion direction, of water molecules within these tracts, providing a reliable assessment of microstructural integrity of white matter fibers (Fox et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With many centers contributing relatively few patients, variability between sites must be minimized. There have been several reports comparing diffusion measurements in multicenter studies 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 documenting significant variability for scanners of the same model using essentially identical technique and parameters. Many aspects of scanner performance have been reported to affect the measurement results and introduce discrepancies in the measurement (14) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeatability and reproducibility data were not collected from sites participating in this study. Therefore, it is difficult to assess whether the variability of all the metrics is due to the systematic difference of machines from different vendors, as mentioned in the studies by Volimar et al, Zhu et al, Fox et al, and Teipel et al, 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 or due to random errors in the MRI measurements. Since the goal of this study was to evaluate a QC methodology for multicenter trial, knowing under what circumstance the site needs to undergo hardware/software adjustment is important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…93 A multicenter validation study indicated that fractional anisotropy was the most comparable DTI measure across centers and endorsed its use in multicenter clinical trials. 94 Werring et al 95 demonstrated that a steady and moderate increase of the apparent diffusion coefficient can precede the development of new plaques by 6 -8 months, and they indicated that structural changes in prelesion normal-appearing white matter occur before inflammation and BBB leakage.…”
Section: Future Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%