2015
DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A validation study of a clinical prediction rule for screening asymptomatic chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections among heterosexuals in British Columbia

Abstract: The prediction rule showed good generalisability in STI clinics outside of Vancouver with improved discriminative performance compared with temporal validation. The prediction rule has the potential for augmenting triaging services in STI clinics and enhancing targeted testing in population-based screening programmes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also made revisions to prospectively collect the necessary variables to validate clinical prediction rules (CPR) developed by our team for urine testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea, and blood testing for HIV. These CPR were developed using test results from over 30,000 asymptomatic clients at STI clinics across BC [ 55 , 56 ]. Once these are further validated using prospective GCO data, we aim to include these CPRs prior to promoting GCO outside of our target populations, where our current model for recommending tests may not be appropriate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also made revisions to prospectively collect the necessary variables to validate clinical prediction rules (CPR) developed by our team for urine testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea, and blood testing for HIV. These CPR were developed using test results from over 30,000 asymptomatic clients at STI clinics across BC [ 55 , 56 ]. Once these are further validated using prospective GCO data, we aim to include these CPRs prior to promoting GCO outside of our target populations, where our current model for recommending tests may not be appropriate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9 Also similar to our findings, external validation of this CPR to STI clinic settings beyond Vancouver (the site of the CPR's derivation) demonstrated lower discriminative power (AUC, 0.69) within a higher CT/NG prevalence (5.3%) sample. 25 Regional differences in underlying CT/NG prevalence, as can be observed within GetCheckedOnline's provincial scope, may have impacted the CPR's performance. 26 Although we observed differences in the distribution of gender between the STI clinic and GetCheckedOnline populations, discrimination on GetCheckedOnline was similar between women (AUC, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54–0.69) and men (AUC, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.57–0.71; data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIV status was obtained from the CHIEDZA dataset. The questions in the questionnaire were informed by studies developing risk prediction tools for chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in high-income settings [ 20 , 21 ] and studies investigating risk factors for those infections in sub-Saharan Africa [ 13 , 17 , 19 , 24 , 26 , 27 ]. The questionnaire was administered by a research assistant not involved in STI testing or delivering other CHIEDZA services.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical prediction rules for STIs have been successfully developed for high-income settings to allow for a so-called “selective screening” approach [ 20 , 21 ]. This approach is aimed at minimising costs associated with testing low-risk individuals while detecting most infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%