2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A validation of models for prediction of pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical prediction models, such as PREMM5 and MMRpro, have helped simplify this, in that they can quantify the probability that an individual has LS on the basis of relatively simple personal/family history data. 12,13…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clinical prediction models, such as PREMM5 and MMRpro, have helped simplify this, in that they can quantify the probability that an individual has LS on the basis of relatively simple personal/family history data. 12,13…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical prediction models, such as PREMM5 and MMRpro, have helped simplify this, in that they can quantify the probability that an individual has LS on the basis of relatively simple personal/family history data. 12,13 In parallel, it was recognized that LS cancers almost universally demonstrate a specific molecular biology of frameshift mutations at DNA tandem repeat sequences known as microsatellite instability (MSI), which can be assessed directly from polymerase chain reaction or through immunohistochemical staining for deficient MMR protein expression (MMR-D). This popularized an approach of using tumor testing for MSI/MMR-D as a means of screening patients with cancer to determine who should undergo GGT for LS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation