2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A validated semi-nested PCR for rapid detection of scale drop disease virus (SDDV) in Asian sea bass (Lates calcarifer)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The newly established qPCR assay described in this study is highly specific to SDDV and could detect down to 2 copies per reaction which is 100 times more sensitive than our previous sem-inested PCR and LAMP protocols (Charoenwai et al, 2019; Dangtip et al, 2019), and 25 times more sensitive than a previously probe-based qPCR detection (de Groof et al, 2015). When applied to detection of clinically healthy fish from unaffected farms, it was revealed that ~57.7g% (30/52) samples previously tested negative by semi-nested PCR were positive by qPCR, indicating that the newly established qPCR is suitable for detection of SDDV from subclinically infected fish populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The newly established qPCR assay described in this study is highly specific to SDDV and could detect down to 2 copies per reaction which is 100 times more sensitive than our previous sem-inested PCR and LAMP protocols (Charoenwai et al, 2019; Dangtip et al, 2019), and 25 times more sensitive than a previously probe-based qPCR detection (de Groof et al, 2015). When applied to detection of clinically healthy fish from unaffected farms, it was revealed that ~57.7g% (30/52) samples previously tested negative by semi-nested PCR were positive by qPCR, indicating that the newly established qPCR is suitable for detection of SDDV from subclinically infected fish populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…DNA extracted from 10 bacteria ( Vibrio harveyi, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, V. tubiashi, V. alginolyticus, V. cholera, Streptococcus iniae, Tenacibaculum litopenaei, Pleisiomonas shigelloides , and Nocardia seriolae ) and DNA extracted from fish infected with 2 viruses (nervous necrosis virus (NNV) and infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV)) were used as template. Details of the pathogens used in the specificity assay were described previously (Charoenwai et al, 2019). DNA extracted from clinically healthy Asian sea bass were also included in the assays.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Majority of tilapia farming countries are located in low and middle-income countries. In those countries, conventional PCR remains the preferable technique for many laboratories (in terms of costs and ease of use) compared to less accessible and more expensive quantitative PCR machine (Charoenwai et al 2019). The semi-nested PCR method in this study therefore was designed based on conserved regions of genome segment 1 that was able to amplify representatives from both Thai, Israeli-2011 and Israeli-2012 clades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimized qPCR protocol was subsequently used to test for specificity against extracted genomic DNA from i) clinically healthy fish, ii) from 12 common aquatic bacterial species, and iii) from fish samples infected with either infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV), nervous necrosis virus (NNV), or scale drop disease virus (SDDV). Sample sources and preparation were previously described (Charoenwai et al, 2019; Sriisan et al, 2020). DNA extracted from fin of LCHV-infected fish was used as positive control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, molecular detection methods are required for diagnostic and screening purposes. Several DNA-based detection methods for SDDV have been freely available such as single PCR (Senapin et al, 2019), semi-nested PCR (Charoenwai et al, 2019), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) (Dangtip et al, 2019), probe-based qPCR (de Groof et al, 2015), and SYBR Green-based qPCR (Sriisan et al, 2020). The latter one is the most sensitive method with a detection limit of 2 copies of DNA template per reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%