2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34365.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Validated Lip Fullness Grading Scale

Abstract: The 5-point photonumeric scale generated spans the fullness of the upper and lower lip for which patients commonly seek correction. This scale is well stratified, with low intra- and interrater variability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the uniform distribution has an unambiguous definition with equal percentages of subjects across grades, making it straightforward to compare results across scales and across studies. For some scale reliability studies, this consideration can be addressed by preselecting subject images to ensure uniform distributions across scale grades5, 7, 8, 12, 16; this structure ensures that each grade in the scale is well represented, and the full range of the scale is utilized, explored, and evaluated, as desired in instrument design and testing 37. However, this structure may not be feasible for studies addressing multiple scales with different distributions.…”
Section: Impact Of Distribution Sample Size and Disagreements On Iccmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, the uniform distribution has an unambiguous definition with equal percentages of subjects across grades, making it straightforward to compare results across scales and across studies. For some scale reliability studies, this consideration can be addressed by preselecting subject images to ensure uniform distributions across scale grades5, 7, 8, 12, 16; this structure ensures that each grade in the scale is well represented, and the full range of the scale is utilized, explored, and evaluated, as desired in instrument design and testing 37. However, this structure may not be feasible for studies addressing multiple scales with different distributions.…”
Section: Impact Of Distribution Sample Size and Disagreements On Iccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scales that are a combination of phrases and photographs are known as photonumeric scales. In aesthetic studies, some examples of scales are measures for the degree of wrinkling,3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 lip fullness,9, 10, 11, 12 sagging,13 photodamage,14 and dyspigmentation,15 and they have been developed and evaluated using reliability indexes. In many aesthetic scale reliability studies, ICC is used to determine consistency, where a higher ICC signifies better consistency 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A validated 5-point photonumeric lip scale, the lip fullness scale (LFS) has been developed by Carutthers et al16 Separate grading for upper and lower lips is recommended. The scale ratings are: very thin (0), thin (1), moderately thick (2), thick (3), and full (4) 16…”
Section: Grading Scales For Perioral Lines and Lip Fullnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of utmost importance in normal life. There are more grading systems for the perioral area available but a detailed discussion is not the focus of this review 15,16…”
Section: Grading Scales For Perioral Lines and Lip Fullnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also developed a grading system for lip fullness to objectify the augmentation goal and to provide aesthetic guidelines and described their favorite techniques24 (Table 1). They state that there are five grades of lip fullness, which range from very thin (0) to full (4) on a 5-point photonumeric rating scale designed to objectively quantify the three-dimensional fullness of the lip 23,24. This scale does not take the relation between upper and lower lip into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%