A valid alternative for in-person language assessments in brain tumor patients: feasibility and validity measures of the new TeleLanguage test

Abstract

Background Although language deficits after awake brain surgery are usually milder than post-stroke, postoperative language assessments are needed to identify these. Follow-up of brain tumor patients in certain geographical regions can be difficult when most patients are not local and come from afar. We developed a short telephone-based test for pre- and postoperative language assessments. Methods The development of the TeleLanguage Test was based on the Dutch Linguistic Intraoperative Protocol and existing standardized English batteries. Two parallel versions were composed and tested in healthy native English speakers. Subsequently, the TeleLanguage Test was administered in a group of 14 tumor patients before surgery and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. The test includes auditory comprehension, repetition, semantic selection, sentence or story completion, verbal naming, and fluency tests. It takes less than 20 minutes to administer. Results Healthy participants had no difficulty performing any of the language tests via the phone, attesting to the feasibility of a phone assessment. In the patient group, all TeleLanguage test scores significantly declined shortly after surgery with a recovery to preoperative levels at 3 months postsurgery for naming and fluency tasks and a recovery to normal levels for the other language tasks. Analysis of the in-person language assessments (until 1 month) revealed a similar profile. Conclusion The use of the TeleLanguage battery to conduct language assessments from afar can provide convenience, might optimize patient care, and enables longitudinal clinical research. The TeleLanguage is a valid tool for various clinical and scientific purposes.

Case report: Pragmatic impairment in multiple sclerosis after worsening of clinical symptoms

“…The same method has been previously used to compare performances ( De Witte et al, 2019 ) or test scales with different score ranges ( Klietz et al, 2019 ). After percentage transforming, we subtracted the second assessment percentage-transformed scores from the first assessment ones, thus obtaining the magnitude of each test’s change in scores between assessments ( Table 1 , column 10), which represents the change in performance after the clinical worsening.…”

The clinical and neurocognitive functional changes with awake brain mapping for gliomas invading eloquent areas: Institutional experience and the utility of The Montreal Cognitive Assessment

“…In addition, the results of comprehensive battery may be affected by the professional expertise and level of experience of the evaluators, limiting the scope of its application as routine tests. Therefore, researchers tried to investigate the use of MoCA in the primary brain tumor population, especially in the setting of global COVID-19 pandemic (16,42).…”

Tele-neuropsychological assessment tools in Italy: a systematic review on psychometric properties and usability

“…A proof-of-concept contribution to both the aforementioned instances has been provided, for the English language, by De Witte et al [ 59 ], who developed a telephone-based screening for language deficits (domain-specific) for remotely monitoring patients who underwent surgical treatment of brain neoplasms (disease-specific). Moreover, a discrete number of domain-specific tests are validated for web or videoconference administration for the English language [ 1 , 11 ].…”