2023
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11626-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A vacuum solution of modified Einstein equations based on fractional calculus

Abstract: In this work, we construct a modified version of the Einstein field equations for a vacuum and spherically symmetric spacetime in terms of the Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative. The main difference between our approach and other works is that we ensure that both the classical differential equations and the classical solutions are exactly recovered in the limit when the fractional parameter is turned off. We assume that the fractional equations are valid inside and near the horizon radius and match the cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, LSM heavily relies on GR: the switch from partial to fractional derivative is performed on the Euler-Lagrange equations obtained from the usual Einstein-Hilbert action. This is by far the oldest and the most manageable method, and as such it has been used to extend Friedman-Robertson-Walker cosmology [33] and the Schwarzschild exterior solution [15]. ISM is an in-between approach: in the case of the fractional action-like variational approach, the switch from partial to fractional derivative is applied to the Einstein-Hilbert action before this latter is extremized (see for example equations ( 20) and ( 33) in [31]).…”
Section: Metric Of a Fractional Stringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, LSM heavily relies on GR: the switch from partial to fractional derivative is performed on the Euler-Lagrange equations obtained from the usual Einstein-Hilbert action. This is by far the oldest and the most manageable method, and as such it has been used to extend Friedman-Robertson-Walker cosmology [33] and the Schwarzschild exterior solution [15]. ISM is an in-between approach: in the case of the fractional action-like variational approach, the switch from partial to fractional derivative is applied to the Einstein-Hilbert action before this latter is extremized (see for example equations ( 20) and ( 33) in [31]).…”
Section: Metric Of a Fractional Stringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], the authors used a fractional action principle (based on the Caputo fractional derivative) built from a FLRW ansatz to derive the fractional Friedman equations: they set stringent constraints on the fractional parameter to fit to observational data. In another remarkable work [15], the authors determined a vacuum solution for a static and spherically-symmetric time-space based on the fractional Riemann-Liouville derivative: while the exterior Schwarzschild's metric is retrieved outside the horizon, the interior solutions are not only regular at r = 0, but depending on the fractional parameter, they can match with gravastar models. More recently, the authors of [16] have proposed a fractional anisotropy function relating both the tangential and radial pressure of a spherically symmetric fluid based on the Grünwald-Letnikov fractional derivative, which is a discrete version of the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose from the sixteen 4-bases shown in Figure 7, one 4-basis, for example, e 5 (e0 (5) ,e1 (5) ,e2 (5) ,e3 (5) ) and letʹs call it ʺbaseʺ (see Figure 8). An affine 4-dimensional space, the directions of the axes of which are given by the 4-basis e 5 (e0 (5) ,e1 (5) ,e2 (5) ,e3 (5) ) with the conventional signature {+ + + +}.…”
Section: Stignature Of An Affine 4-dimensional Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conditionally accept that the directions of all unit vectors of the ʺbaseʺ are positive (see Figure 8) ei (5) (e0 (5) ,e1 (5) ,e2 (5) ,e3 (5) ) = (+1, +1,+ 1, +1)  {+ + + +}.…”
Section: Stignature Of An Affine 4-dimensional Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation