“…This is counterintuitive because, for instance, an investor with increasing RRA becomes more averse to a percentage loss in wealth when his wealth increases. As in West, Edison, and Cho (1993) and Fleming, Kirby, and Ostdiek (2001), …xing the degree of RRA, , implies that expected utility is linearly homogeneous in wealth: double wealth and expected utility doubles. Furthermore, by …xing instead of , we are implicitly interpreting quadratic utility as an approximation to a nonquadratic utility function, with the approximating choice of dependent on wealth.…”