1987
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(87)90038-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A utility analysis of drinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, it seems that problem drinkers of both sexes generally hold stronger alcohol expectancies than do nonproblem drinkers. This finding is consistent with previous studies by Brown (1985) and Critchlow (1987) who found that college students who drank heavily or exhibited problem drinking held stronger expectancies than did those students who did not drink in such ways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More specifically, it seems that problem drinkers of both sexes generally hold stronger alcohol expectancies than do nonproblem drinkers. This finding is consistent with previous studies by Brown (1985) and Critchlow (1987) who found that college students who drank heavily or exhibited problem drinking held stronger expectancies than did those students who did not drink in such ways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For example, Brown, Creamer, and Stetson (1987) found that alcohol abusers expected more positive outcomes from drinking than did their nonabusing peers. Similarly, Critchlow (1987) found that heavy drinkers held stronger expectations of positive consequences of alcohol use than did light drinkers and that they generally evaluated all drinking outcomes more positively. Furthermore, Brown (1985) reported that alcohol expectancies were better predictors of heavy drinking and problem drinking than was a set of demographic variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Previous research (see Baer, 1994;Critchlow, 1987;Darkes & Goldman, 1993;Evans & Dunn, 1995;Stacy, Widaman, & Marlatt, 1990) has identified a number of specific factors associated with heavy drinking, including demographic characteristics (gender and fraternity/sorority membership); descriptive and injunctive social norms; enhancement, social, coping and conformity drinking motives, expectancies and tendencies; and subjective evaluations of positive and negative alcohol effects. Surprisingly little research has evaluated the relative contribution of different factors in predicting AC and related problems as well as the direct impact of these constructs on binge-drinking consequences in a systematic manner (Neighbors, Lee, Lewis, Fossos, & Larimer, 2007;Turrisi, Wiersma, & Hughes, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These beliefs precede direct experience with alcohol and are influenced by social contexts and role models such as family, peers, and mass media (Christiansen, Goldman, & Inn, 1982). Once established, they influence various aspects of alcohol use (Goldman, et al, 1991; Leigh & Stacy, 1991), including current drinking behaviors (for a review, see Baer, 2002; Critchlow, 1987; Leigh, 1987, 1989; Leigh & Stacy, 1993), future alcohol and drug use (Christiansen, Smith, Roehling, & Goldman, 1989; Stacy, Newcomb, & Bentler, 1991; Stacy, Widaman, & Marlatt, 1990), and alcohol dependence symptoms (Wood, Sher, & Strathman, 1996). Differences in AEs have been observed between subtypes of drinkers (e.g., lone vs. group problem drinkers, restrained and unrestrained drinkers), genders, and ethnicities (Bensley, 1991; Gustafson, 1993; Jones & McMahon, 1992; McMahon, Jones, & O'Donnell, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%