2012
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2012.2209623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A UTD Triple Diffraction Coefficient for Straight Wedges in Arbitrary Configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we excluded the survey of fundamental theory (GO and UTD) in this paper. References [45]- [49] give more information on GO and UTD, and [50]- [54] give more information on slope diffraction and multi-diffraction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we excluded the survey of fundamental theory (GO and UTD) in this paper. References [45]- [49] give more information on GO and UTD, and [50]- [54] give more information on slope diffraction and multi-diffraction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently from the buildings vertical corners, horizontal edges are not necessarily parallel to each other, and this poses a theoretical limit to the computation of the multiplediffracted field using a 3D ray tracing approach. In fact, although the geometrical trajectories can be tracked regardless of the number of involved diffractions [19], analytical expressions for the corresponding propagating field are available only for up to 3 if the wedges are arbitrarily oriented [20]. Since ORT propagation may sometimes require more than 3 diffractions, especially for large link distance, for rays undergoing more than 2 diffractions the fully 3D geometrical computation is replaced with a simplified approach using a multiple-screen UTD model limited to the vertical plane, considering one/two knife-edges for each building along the radial line between the Tx and the receiver (Rx).…”
Section: Extensions To the Ray Tracing Enginementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such residual ray discontinuities, if significant, together with the fact that a vanishing field is predicted in their associated ray shadow regions might render the resulting UTD description inaccurate. Therefore, higher order ray contributions must be added to complete the field description to remove the above deficiency, namely one may need to add vertex diffracted rays [9]- [14], doubly and triply wedge diffracted rays [15], [16], wedge diffraction of creeping waves [17], and wedge excited creeping wave ray fields [18], [19]. These contributions augment the asymptotic solution to higher orders outside their respective ray SB transition regions, and their uniform description restores the continuity of the field at the wedge diffracted and creeping wave-induced surface ray SBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%