2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1466-853x(04)00019-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A users guide to outcome measurement following ACL reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shaw et al recommended that key outcome measures should be used at specific time frames postoperatively, in order to optimise the sensitivity of these measuring tools and thus enhance its validity and reliability. 33 Future research in this field should attempt to identify the most appropriate outcome measurement type and measurement time frames after ACL reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Shaw et al recommended that key outcome measures should be used at specific time frames postoperatively, in order to optimise the sensitivity of these measuring tools and thus enhance its validity and reliability. 33 Future research in this field should attempt to identify the most appropriate outcome measurement type and measurement time frames after ACL reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 The CKRS is a unique rating system that consists of several subdivisions that provide questionnaires for symptoms, function and occupation. 33 The measures were taken at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. At 6 months postoperatively, statistically significant differences between the groups were demonstrated for the subdivision 'Problems with Sport'.…”
Section: Functional Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…33 • Function: The ability to safely perform weight-bearing activities including gait, stair climbing and pre-injury function. 21 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%