A user study of auditory, head-up and multi-modal displays in vehicles

Jakus, Grega; Dicke, Christina; Sodnik, Jaka

doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.08.008

Cited by 59 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several studies presented combined interfaces of speech input and HUD visual output (Wang et al, 2014), or hand gestures as input with HUD visual output (Farooq et al, 2014;Lauber et al, 2014). In Jakus et al (2015) it was concluded that visual and audiovisual HUD interface is faster and more efficient than audio-only display. Although no significant difference between the visual only and audio-visual displays in terms of efficiency and safety was found, most participants preferred the multi-modal interface while driving.…”

Section: Apps Mappingmentioning

confidence: 98%

Which smartphone's apps may contribute to road safety? An AHP model to evaluate experts' opinions

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Apps Mappingmentioning

confidence: 98%

Which smartphone's apps may contribute to road safety? An AHP model to evaluate experts' opinions

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This study concluded that visual +3D audio displays provided better precision and shorter reaction times, while multimodal configuration had higher rates on perceiving threat position. These types of researches are some of the most outstanding ones, specifically those that explore some auditory stimuli configurations for interacting with HUD functionalities; as proposed by Jakus et al [17], who explored some auditory stimuli configurations for handling HUD functionalities, finding that audio-visual HUD system configurations allow to keep attention on the road instead of on HUDs, which was really valuable when driving situations required full visual attention; also, these system configurations allowed to use HUD visual interfaces in less time and with less physical effort. Luzheng et al [4] proposed a P300 Brain Computer Interface (BCI) in the context of HUDs, mainly for predicting the user's driving destination.…”

Section: Related Work: Driver Interfaces and Driver Behaviourmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, regarding different studies about driving benefits for HUD systems when using Audio-Visual (AV) feedbacks [5,15,17], these last ones were implemented on the HUD visual interface here proposed. Also, this interface was designed according to visual design patterns that have been established by previous studies, mainly for hierarchical and list-based menu structures [24,25].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

User experience comparison among touchless, haptic and voice Head-Up Displays interfaces in automobiles

Betancur

Gómez

Merienne

et al. 2018

Int J Interact Des Manuf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper evaluates driving experiences when using a Head-Up Display (HUD) system by different interaction methods, since HUDs in automotive market do not follow standard interaction methods (Betancur et al. in Int J Interact Des Manuf 12(1):199-214, [3]), and therefore it is difficult to identify what types of these methods are the most appropriated in terms of usability for being implemented in HUDs. This paper focuses on comparing the mental workload that a driver could experience while interacting with a specific HUD visual interface by touchless gestures, haptic or voice methods. Then, test subjects (n 15) performed conjointly a driving activity and a set of in-vehicle tasks by using these interaction methods throughout a HUD. The experiments show that the haptic method was better accepted than the touchless gestures and voice methods. Nevertheless, the touchless gestures method was explored under some specific usability configurations, in order to demonstrate that it was not significantly different from the haptic method. Keywords Head-Up Display • Human-machine interface • Vehicle 1 Introduction Regarding the authors' perspective, the Interactive approach concept explores different ways for interacting with a technical system, mainly looking for enhancing the user experience and performance. Consequently, this paper proposes a comparison among different interaction methods applied to a HUD system, in order to identify the best and worst qualities of every one of these from drivers' point of view. According to the above, the interactive development here

show abstract

“…Dashboard and central console is the main visual display device. A novel device is called "head-up displays" which allows drivers to concentrate on the front window (Jakus et al, 2015, Kim et al, 2016. Meanwhile, visual warning design according to different colour, content or symbols represent different meaning and more important which could reflect the urgency of a hazard (Wogalter et al, 2002).…”

Section: Interacting With Adasmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Ontological Approach to Inform HMI Designs for Minimising Driver Distractions with ADAS

Fan

Jiang

Doğan

et al. 2018

Electronic Workshops in Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

are in-vehicle systems designed to enhance driving safety and efficiency as well as comfort for drivers in the driving process. Recent studies have noticed that when Human Machine Interface (HMI) is not designed properly, an ADAS can cause distraction which would affect its usage and even lead to safety issues. Current understanding of these issues is limited to the context-dependent nature of such systems. This paper reports the development of a holistic conceptualisation of how drivers interact with ADAS and how such interaction could lead to potential distraction. This is done taking an ontological approach to contextualise the potential distraction, driving tasks and user interactions centred on the use of ADAS. Example scenarios are also given to demonstrate how the developed ontology can be used to deduce rules for identifying distraction from ADAS and informing future designs.

show abstract

A user study of auditory, head-up and multi-modal displays in vehicles

Cited by 59 publications

References 8 publications

Which smartphone's apps may contribute to road safety? An AHP model to evaluate experts' opinions

Which smartphone's apps may contribute to road safety? An AHP model to evaluate experts' opinions

User experience comparison among touchless, haptic and voice Head-Up Displays interfaces in automobiles

An Ontological Approach to Inform HMI Designs for Minimising Driver Distractions with ADAS

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About