2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16202-2_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A User Model to Predict User Satisfaction with Spoken Dialog Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the relationship between user satisfaction and the different metrics does not have to be linear, as the analysis proposed in PARADISE assumes. Furthermore, PARADISE tries to infer user satisfaction as an average measure across all the scenarios performed by a single user, or even considering all the users in the measurement (Möller and Engelbrecht, 2008;Engelbrecht and Möller, 2010). This may not be the optimal strategy to carry out, since the satisfaction of a user may vary from one scenario to another, or even within a single scenario, depending on how the interaction evolves, on whether the system reacts to each intervention of the user, on the errors that it makes, and so on.…”
Section: On the Evaluation Of Adaptive Dialogue Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the relationship between user satisfaction and the different metrics does not have to be linear, as the analysis proposed in PARADISE assumes. Furthermore, PARADISE tries to infer user satisfaction as an average measure across all the scenarios performed by a single user, or even considering all the users in the measurement (Möller and Engelbrecht, 2008;Engelbrecht and Möller, 2010). This may not be the optimal strategy to carry out, since the satisfaction of a user may vary from one scenario to another, or even within a single scenario, depending on how the interaction evolves, on whether the system reacts to each intervention of the user, on the errors that it makes, and so on.…”
Section: On the Evaluation Of Adaptive Dialogue Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%