1997
DOI: 10.1080/03043799708923446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A User Interface Design for a Video-on-demand Service Trial in an Educational Setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While authors such as Littlejohn et al (2012), Margaryan et al (2011) and Buckingham (2007) have argued that to develop digital literacy, students should be guided through authentic tasks in their studies which involve the integration of digital media, evidence to date has focused on more stand-alone activities such as the provision of video to support understanding of concepts and practices (E.g. Gurrin et al, 2004;Mustillo et al, 1997) or through student write-ups about video content (E.g. MacKinnon & Vibert, 2012;Sherer & Shea, 2011).…”
Section: Description Of Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While authors such as Littlejohn et al (2012), Margaryan et al (2011) and Buckingham (2007) have argued that to develop digital literacy, students should be guided through authentic tasks in their studies which involve the integration of digital media, evidence to date has focused on more stand-alone activities such as the provision of video to support understanding of concepts and practices (E.g. Gurrin et al, 2004;Mustillo et al, 1997) or through student write-ups about video content (E.g. MacKinnon & Vibert, 2012;Sherer & Shea, 2011).…”
Section: Description Of Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, this approach may offer students important collaborative opportunities by sharing opinions and content amongst their peers (Kaufman and Mohan 2009;Mardis 2009;Tiernan and Gurrin 2012b). Universities have been experimenting with approaches to providing video content such as Video on Demand services (Mustillo et al 2010;Toppin 2010), and providing video content on Learning Management Systems (LMS) (Kelsey 2000;Davis and Niederhauser 2005). Recent developments in video technology and related web technologies have increased the potential for the production of personalised, online video repositories that can be used for collaborative online approaches to video supported learning (Gurrin 2009;Gurrin et al 2004;Smeaton 2001;Ferguson et al 2009).…”
Section: Introduction and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar trial conducted in Iowa State University found that while making use of the video-on-demand service mandatory, and in particular linking its use to continuous assessment, yielded the greatest results. Students had a similar appetite for more interactive ways of engaging with peers and content [13]. Access to content is also a critical factor, with the best results being achieved when material is available through a web interface both on and off campus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%