2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13654-2_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A User-Centric Evaluation of the Europeana Digital Library

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is essential that cultural heritage information is usable in every sense for it to be sustainable (Dobreva & Chowdhury, ; Jemielniak & Wilamowski, ). Broadly speaking, information practices consist of mechanisms and methods of collecting information, storage and access of information, seeking and usage of information, curation of information, sharing of information, and disposal of information (Chowdhury & Koya, ; Cox, ; Davenport, ; McKenzie, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essential that cultural heritage information is usable in every sense for it to be sustainable (Dobreva & Chowdhury, ; Jemielniak & Wilamowski, ). Broadly speaking, information practices consist of mechanisms and methods of collecting information, storage and access of information, seeking and usage of information, curation of information, sharing of information, and disposal of information (Chowdhury & Koya, ; Cox, ; Davenport, ; McKenzie, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have noted that the library users' perceived convenience of digital books is compromised by poor usability and other interface features (Wacholder, 2008;Pei et al, 2009;Shelburne, 2009). In a usability study of Europeana (Dobreva and Chowdhury, 2010), it was noted that young users' information needs and search strategies and expectations were quite different from those of more matured users. The study further noted that many younger users wanted to be able to download, annotate and share digital objects.…”
Section: Digital Information Servicesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The most popular result refinement options in Europeana are the language and country facets providing an indicator for the importance of language and geographic search options (IRN Research 2009, p. 3). Dobreva and Chowdhury (2010) also found out that a strong need for more content in native languages as well as result translation options exists. The majority of users (80%) are willing to control the query translation process meaning that active user control for multilingual access would be acceptable (Agosti et al, 2009).…”
Section: Multilinguality In Europeanamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, users feel comfortable accessing the portal and scanning results in their native language or in English. A "significant language barrier was perceived" when users had to deal with content in unknown languages (Dobreva and Chowdhury, 2010). The most popular result refinement options in Europeana are the language and country facets providing an indicator for the importance of language and geographic search options (IRN Research 2009, p. 3).…”
Section: Multilinguality In Europeanamentioning
confidence: 99%