2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr06850k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A universal signature in the melting of metallic nanoparticles

Abstract: We unveil a universal feature in the distribution of the atomic-pair distances that characterizes the melting of monometallic nanoparticles, in vacuum or in a strongly interacting environment, regardless of their size, shape, and composition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(97 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation holds regardless of whether they lie in the inner part or at the surface of the NP, and their coordination. Furthermore, this result confirms and rationalizes the universal signature of melting for the whole NP we recently proposed 13 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This observation holds regardless of whether they lie in the inner part or at the surface of the NP, and their coordination. Furthermore, this result confirms and rationalizes the universal signature of melting for the whole NP we recently proposed 13 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The first concerns the difficulty of defining an unbiased characterization of the phase change mechanism. Indeed, the identification of order parameters to characterize solid–liquid phase changes at the nanoscale is an active topic of debate with a long tradition 10 13 . Widely used methods often rely on chemical-intuition and heuristic approaches, and can therefore lead to descriptive order parameters, which are neither fully general nor robust to parameter tuning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we directly contrast the simulated spectra with the experimental curve, using the Kullback-Leibler (D KL ) divergence, which quantifies how much two curves differ from each other. D KL is zero for identical curves, and increases the more they diverge [48]. Therefore, we can assign geometries by comparing D KL -1 values; a better agreement between experiment and calculation is reflected in a larger D KL -1 value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…D KL is zero for identical curves, and increases the more they diverge. 48 Therefore, we can assign geometries by comparing D KL −1 values; a better agreement between experiment and calculation is reflected in a larger D KL −1 value. For this procedure, the computed vibrational modes of a specific isomer were used to construct a simulated IR spectrum, in which Gaussian functions were assumed centered at each vibrational frequency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kullback–Leibler divergence is zero when both distributions are identical, and increases the more they diverge from each other [ 39 ]. Using this analysis to quantify the hybridization between Au and Ar gives the values 3.18, 3.40 and 3.51, for Au 3 Ar + , Au 15 Ar + and Au 16 Ar + , respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%