2008
DOI: 10.1038/nrg2165-c1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A universal classification of eukaryotic transposable elements implemented in Repbase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
377
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 429 publications
(381 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
377
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…S5). A huge diversity of mobile elements has been described in the three domains of life (26)(27)(28), and the list is still growing (29). However, the PgV-16T repeats do not resemble any of them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5). A huge diversity of mobile elements has been described in the three domains of life (26)(27)(28), and the list is still growing (29). However, the PgV-16T repeats do not resemble any of them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-specific variation in the occurrence of TEs Identified TEs were classified following the universal classification system of Kapitonov and Jurka (2008) implemented in Repbase. Information regarding TE transpositional mechanism (autonomous/non-autonomous) was obtained from Repbase and Web of Science reports.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the DNA level, RepeatModeler (http://www.repeatmasker.org/RepeatModeler.html) and LTR_FINDER 44 software were used to build de novo repeat libraries. RepeatMasker (version 3.2.9) was run against de novo library and repbase 45 separately to identify homologous repeats, which were classified into known classes of repeats 46 . At the protein level, RM-BLASTX within RepeatProteinMask in RepeatMasker software package was used against the transposable elements protein database.…”
Section: Competing Financial Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%