2000
DOI: 10.1039/b002483j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A universal approach to web-based chemistry using XML and CML

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, more flexible input files need to be developed. The extensible markup language is used for input files because of the possibility to annotate the contents and for ease of porting to other applications 17. Some kind of context‐sensitive folding editor is developed (or ported from a different software) to keep the input comprehensible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, more flexible input files need to be developed. The extensible markup language is used for input files because of the possibility to annotate the contents and for ease of porting to other applications 17. Some kind of context‐sensitive folding editor is developed (or ported from a different software) to keep the input comprehensible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This facilitates the study of a wide range of chemical subdomains which vary in syntactic style, vocabulary and semantic abstraction. Moreover, it is possible to convert ChemicalTagger's output into CML [ 22 ] using a ChemicalTagger2CML converter. Thus, identified phrase-based chemistry such as solutions, reaction and procedures can converted into computable CML.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its conventions guarantee that the data is searchable, stylable, sortable, validatable, transformable, mergeable, transmittable, printable, and even human readable. 21 A strongly simplified example of an hteML-conforming data structure is shown in Fig. 4, and another example is given later in this paper ͑see Fig.…”
Section: Data Structures: Htemlmentioning
confidence: 99%