2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Universal Approach to Quantify Overpotential-Dependent Selectivity Trends for the Competing Oxygen Evolution and Peroxide Formation Reactions: A Case Study on Graphene Model Electrodes

Abstract: In this article, we study the competing oxygen evolution and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) formation reactions for periodic models of graphene with different active-site concentrations by means of density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Linking the DFT calculations to ab-initio thermodynamic considerations in conjunction with microkinetic modeling enables gaining deep insights into the activity and selectivity trends of graphene-based electrodes as a function of applied bias. We illustrate that both the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One might argue that the usage of adsorption free energies to model the reaction kinetics is an oversimplification of a complex problem. However, we would like to emphasize that the BEP relation has been justified in previous works, [54,55] and the usage of adsorption free energies rather than transition states (kinetics) enables application of our approach for a data-driven screening of the BI, which is in the foreground of this manuscript. In summary, eq.…”
Section: Methods Bifunctional Index From Cyclic Voltammetrymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One might argue that the usage of adsorption free energies to model the reaction kinetics is an oversimplification of a complex problem. However, we would like to emphasize that the BEP relation has been justified in previous works, [54,55] and the usage of adsorption free energies rather than transition states (kinetics) enables application of our approach for a data-driven screening of the BI, which is in the foreground of this manuscript. In summary, eq.…”
Section: Methods Bifunctional Index From Cyclic Voltammetrymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Figure 2). As discussed in previous works of Exner, there is an internal Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi (BEP) relation [54] between the rds and the overpotentialdependent descriptor G max h ð Þ, [24,49,55] which reads:…”
Section: Methods Bifunctional Index From Cyclic Voltammetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction activity and selectivity toward competing products can be evaluated by the Gibbs free-energy change and binding energy from the perspective of thermodynamics. 36,37 Ni−N 4 and Co−N 4 are adopted as representative structures of single-atom sites on CNTs (Figure 6a,b), according to reported literature studies. 38,39 The reactivity toward CO 2 RR and HER can be reflected in the binding energy of the key intermediates *CO and *H, respectively.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DFT calculations were performed to get insight into the electrocatalytic mechanism of single-atom sites and NPs. The reaction activity and selectivity toward competing products can be evaluated by the Gibbs free-energy change and binding energy from the perspective of thermodynamics. , Ni–N 4 and Co–N 4 are adopted as representative structures of single-atom sites on CNTs (Figure a,b), according to reported literature studies. , The reactivity toward CO 2 RR and HER can be reflected in the binding energy of the key intermediates *CO and *H, respectively. The Ni–N 4 -CNT structure was calculated to have a positive binding energy of *CO (0.34 eV), while Co–N 4 -CNT, Ni(111), and Co(111) models present negative binding energies (Figure c), which suggests that the desorption of CO is more easi to occur on Ni–N 4 -CNT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition from the reaction intermediate with the lowest free energy to the reaction intermediate with the highest free energy in the free energy diagram is described using G max . 55–57 The difference between the G max values of the CRR and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) is used to estimate the selectivity of the catalyst, which is expressed as: G sel = G max(HER) − G max(CRR) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%