2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17445-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A universal and independent synthetic DNA ladder for the quantitative measurement of genomic features

Abstract: Standard units of measurement are required for the quantitative description of nature; however, few standard units have been established for genomics to date. Here, we have developed a synthetic DNA ladder that defines a quantitative standard unit that can measure DNA sequence abundance within a next-generation sequencing library. The ladder can be spiked into a DNA sample, and act as an internal scale that measures quantitative genetics features. Unlike previous spike-ins, the ladder is encoded within a singl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This CAPTOR master mixture was then used to prepare libraries from mock microbial communities for ONT sequencing (as described above). The variable CAPTOR sequences were then retrieved from each read, counted and compared to the expected CAPTOR concentration to generate a staggered reference ladder that can measure quantitative library features 22 (see Methods).
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This CAPTOR master mixture was then used to prepare libraries from mock microbial communities for ONT sequencing (as described above). The variable CAPTOR sequences were then retrieved from each read, counted and compared to the expected CAPTOR concentration to generate a staggered reference ladder that can measure quantitative library features 22 (see Methods).
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spike-in standards facilitate the quantification of microbial targets in metagenomes at accuracies similar to quantitative PCR methods (6)(7)(8)11,12). The major advantage of quantitative metagenomics is the ability to simultaneously quantify thousands of targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these approaches depend on the accuracy of time-and resource-consuming ancillary measurements that can be error prone and the latter is not suitable for quantitative viral metagenomes (viromes), as viruses lack conserved genes. Alternatively, DNA standards have been added to samples at known concentrations to facilitate absolute abundance measurements in metagenomes (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). With this approach, target gene or genome counts in the metagenome are quantified using the number of reads that map to the standards and the known standard concentrations (6,8,(11)(12)(13)15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations