1964
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.3160170203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A uniqueness theorem for the reduced wave equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Tí* denotes the zero order Hankel function of the first kind. Then for fixed z0 and z^z0 Q satisfies (1) and (2). For small r we have…”
Section: Proof Of the Existencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…where Tí* denotes the zero order Hankel function of the first kind. Then for fixed z0 and z^z0 Q satisfies (1) and (2). For small r we have…”
Section: Proof Of the Existencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…A corollary of the conjecture is that for the Dirichlet problem it is impossible to avoid having a scattered field when the incident field consists of an odd number of plane waves. Conversely, it is known that if the incident field is zero for a smooth finite arc then the field scattered off the arc is zero [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that the functions x¿(í) and y((t) have Holder continuous second derivatives and that the arcs £,-do not intersect. We denote the union of the £,'s by £ and the open set £2 -£ by G. We seek a function u,(x, y) which satisfies the following conditions: Uniqueness follows from the work of Levine [2]. (Levine proves his uniqueness theorem in the three dimensional case, however his proof can easily be modified so as to apply here.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uniqueness follows from the work of Levine [2]. (Levine proves his uniqueness theorem in the three dimensional case, however his proof can easily be modified so as to apply here.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%