2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2011.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unifying view on dataset shift in classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
392
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 697 publications
(432 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
392
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…2b, we see the MAR-C assumption, where S is a function of the true (unobservable) class label. In the missing data literature (Little and Rubin 2002), this scenario is classified as missing-not-at-random, and, since the missingness depends only in the class, Moreno-Torres et al (2012) name it as missing-completely-at-random class dependent (MAR-C). We can connect the two semi-supervised scenarios further, with the following observation: MCAR can be seen as a special case of MAR-C.…”
Section: Class-prior-change Semi-supervised Scenario (Or Mar-c)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2b, we see the MAR-C assumption, where S is a function of the true (unobservable) class label. In the missing data literature (Little and Rubin 2002), this scenario is classified as missing-not-at-random, and, since the missingness depends only in the class, Moreno-Torres et al (2012) name it as missing-completely-at-random class dependent (MAR-C). We can connect the two semi-supervised scenarios further, with the following observation: MCAR can be seen as a special case of MAR-C.…”
Section: Class-prior-change Semi-supervised Scenario (Or Mar-c)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example another assumption used in the semi-supervised learning is when the missingness mechanism depends directly only on the features or in other words the labelling of an example is conditionally independent of the class, given the feature values. This scenario is known in missing data literature as missing at random (MAR) (Moreno-Torres et al 2012). The importance of this assumption is also presented in the framework of semi-supervised regression by Lafferty and Wasserman (2007).…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Distribution shift: The most obvious type of context change is given by a change in the data distribution. One common way of looking at a change in the data is known as data shift [53,49]. Data shift is usually classified into covariate shift, prior probability shift and concept drift, but more thorough classifications have been developed (see, e.g., [49]).…”
Section: Taxonomy Of Context Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that while we have given a brief overview of concept drift in particular, Moreno-Torres et al [64] provide a more focused overview of different forms of "dataset drift", as well as their causes.…”
Section: Concept Driftmentioning
confidence: 99%