1990
DOI: 10.1177/0049124190018004002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Unifying Framework for Markov Modeling in Discrete Space and Discrete Time

Abstract: The focus of this article is on Markov models for the analysis of panel data and, more specifically, on data obtained from repeated measurements of one categorical variable at several consecutive points in time. We first review developments in the field that attack the two main problems of the simple Markov model. The Mixed Markov model extends the simple model by allowing for population heterogeneity; the Latent Markov model incorporates measurement error and latent change into the simple model. Second, we pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge only Rendtel et al (1998) have used a latent structure analysis to separate true poverty mobility from measurement error. Using a latent Markov model, originally introduced for this purpose by Langeheine and van de Pol (1990), they arrived at the striking finding that almost half of the observed poverty mobility in their German Socio-Economic Panel data might be due to measurement error. Their study dealt only with Germany, but we can expect that, if we do not correct the measurement error in poverty transition tables, poverty mobility will be over-estimated in other countries as well.…”
Section: Previous Studies Of Poverty Dynamics and The Problem Of Measmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To our knowledge only Rendtel et al (1998) have used a latent structure analysis to separate true poverty mobility from measurement error. Using a latent Markov model, originally introduced for this purpose by Langeheine and van de Pol (1990), they arrived at the striking finding that almost half of the observed poverty mobility in their German Socio-Economic Panel data might be due to measurement error. Their study dealt only with Germany, but we can expect that, if we do not correct the measurement error in poverty transition tables, poverty mobility will be over-estimated in other countries as well.…”
Section: Previous Studies Of Poverty Dynamics and The Problem Of Measmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In labelling these we follow the terminology of Langeheine and van de Pol (1990). The results are shown in Table 5, together with the observed proportion of stable cases (OBS) and of change (OBC).…”
Section: Error Corrected Estimates Of Poverty Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several extensions of standard MCMs with greater flexibility overcome some of these drawbacks, e.g., hidden Markov models (Rabiner 1989), mixture Markov models and latent mixed Markov models (Langeheine and Van de Pol 1990) Ron, Singer, and Tishby 1996;Bühlmann and Wyner 1999), also known as variable-order Markov chains (VOMCs), are a class of models that exhibit many interesting characteristics. They are especially effective in capturing particular high-order dependencies in sequences while remaining parsimonious and simple to estimate.…”
Section: The Markov Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue has been addressed for fixed-length Markov chains in the social sciences literature (Spilerman 1972;Singer and Spilerman 1973;Langeheine and Van de Pol 1990). For VLMCs, we propose two approaches that are explained in this section.…”
Section: Segmented Models and Comparison Of Pstsmentioning
confidence: 99%