“…Some integrity checking methods are described by Hsu and Imielinski (1985), Kowalski et al (1987), Lloyd et al (1987), Bry et al (1988), Urban and Delcambre (1990), Bertino et al (1997). The works presented by Ceri and Widom (1990), Moerkotte and Lockemann (1991), Palopoli and Torlone (1992), Karadimce and Urban (1993), Wuthrich (1993), Ceri et al (1994b) are integrity maintenance methods.…”
“…We suppose that the constraints are satisfiable and correct. Works about constraint satisfiability can be found in Bry et al (1988) and Formica et al (1994).…”
A dynamic constraint expresses conditions that involve facts of two or more states of the database. Since the database is expected to satisfy such conditions, a fundamental issue about integrity constraints is their enforcement. Many methods have been developed in this respect. The purpose of this paper is to present a brief survey of methods for dynamic constraint defmitionand enforcement. Also we classify and compare these methods with respect to several relevant features.
“…Some integrity checking methods are described by Hsu and Imielinski (1985), Kowalski et al (1987), Lloyd et al (1987), Bry et al (1988), Urban and Delcambre (1990), Bertino et al (1997). The works presented by Ceri and Widom (1990), Moerkotte and Lockemann (1991), Palopoli and Torlone (1992), Karadimce and Urban (1993), Wuthrich (1993), Ceri et al (1994b) are integrity maintenance methods.…”
“…We suppose that the constraints are satisfiable and correct. Works about constraint satisfiability can be found in Bry et al (1988) and Formica et al (1994).…”
A dynamic constraint expresses conditions that involve facts of two or more states of the database. Since the database is expected to satisfy such conditions, a fundamental issue about integrity constraints is their enforcement. Many methods have been developed in this respect. The purpose of this paper is to present a brief survey of methods for dynamic constraint defmitionand enforcement. Also we classify and compare these methods with respect to several relevant features.
“…[1,57,2,7,4]), for simplifying integrity constraints (e.g. [43,25,15]), for query optimization (e.g. [46,22,10,11]), etc.…”
Section: Deduction Rules For Specifying System Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17,18,1,2,4,7,55,57,60,61,67,13]), and how integrity constraints are checked when the database is updated (see e.g. [17,18,15,25,39,43,47,49,53,19]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods, e.g. [53,25,15], simplify the integrity constraints with respect to updates. Such simplifications can be formalized as a partial evaluation (or partial deduction) [42,35,36,37,41] of deduction rules similar to those specified above.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.