2010
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Unified Theory for the Effects of Stellar Perturbations and Galactic Tides on Oort Cloud Comets

Abstract: We examine the effects of passing field stars on the angular momentum of a nearly radial orbit of an Oort cloud comet bound to the Sun. We derive the probability density function (PDF) of the change in angular momentum from one stellar encounter, assuming a uniform and isotropic field of perturbers. We show that the total angular momentum follows a Lévy flight, and determine its distribution function. If there is an asymmetry in the directional distribution of perturber velocities, the marginal probability dis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gravitational scattering by Neptune is not expected to result in a mean plane different than the invariable plane. These objects are also too close to the Sun to have their angular momentum significantly affected by Galactic tides or stellar flybys (see, e.g., Collins & Sari 2010). It is therefore interesting to consider possible explanations for the measured deviation from the expected mean plane of the more distant KBOs.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gravitational scattering by Neptune is not expected to result in a mean plane different than the invariable plane. These objects are also too close to the Sun to have their angular momentum significantly affected by Galactic tides or stellar flybys (see, e.g., Collins & Sari 2010). It is therefore interesting to consider possible explanations for the measured deviation from the expected mean plane of the more distant KBOs.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approximation neglects the granularity and stochastic variability of the cluster potential caused by encounters with other stars, which are very important in dense environments of clusters (Heggie 1975;Hut & Bahcall 1983;Hut 1983;Heggie & Rasio 1996;Collins & Sari 2008). The cumulative effect of a large number of such encounters is what eventually contributes to the smooth tidal field of the cluster (Collins & Sari 2010); thus, one hopes that in the long run our framework should provide a qualitatively accurate picture of binary evolution in clusters. Nevertheless, in the future we plan to extend our calculation by including the effects of individual stellar encounters on evolution of the binary inner orbit (Weinberg et al 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing this we neglect the stochastic effect of individual stellar passages on the orbital elements of the binary. Separating the cumulative effect of multiple stellar encounters from the smooth Galactic tide is a non-trivial exercise, as demonstrated previously by Collins & Sari (2010) and Jiang & Tremaine (2010). Nevertheless, for the purposes of clarity, we prefer to focus here on the effects of the mean tidal field due to the smooth mass distribution inside the cluster -effects of encounters with individual stars will be incorporated later.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This regime is appropriate if one is studying perturbations to the orbits of relatively tight systems (hard binaries), such as millisecond pulsars or hot Jupiters. On the other hand, Collins & Sari (2008) (see also Collins & Sari 2010) considered the opposite regime in which the timescale for the flyby interaction is much shorter than the inner binary period, so that the encounter can be treated in the impulse approximation. This is the correct description when studying the dynamics of the Oort Cloud comets in the Galaxy or very soft binaries in clusters.…”
Section: Stellar Scattering and Other Non-ideal Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%