2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4cp02508c
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified study for water adsorption on metals: meaningful models from structural motifs

Abstract: The adsorption of the first water layer on metals combines several structural motifs like pentagons, hexagons, and heptagons interconnected variably leading to a myriad of patterns. Although theoretical methods are now able to discriminate the ground states, there is a need to find simple ways to account for the relative stability of different patterns on the surface. Taking the already reported structures for water bilayers as training sets we have decomposed the adsorption energy of each of the motifs to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the interface shows low ordering as five‐ and seven‐membered rings appear, in good agreement with experiments done at lower coverages . On Ru, half of the water molecules dissociate, and form a very rigid structure containing mostly hexagonal patters ,. However, there is no explicit pH variation at the interface as protons and hydroxyls are trapped on the surface .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, the interface shows low ordering as five‐ and seven‐membered rings appear, in good agreement with experiments done at lower coverages . On Ru, half of the water molecules dissociate, and form a very rigid structure containing mostly hexagonal patters ,. However, there is no explicit pH variation at the interface as protons and hydroxyls are trapped on the surface .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…[98] On Ru, half of the water molecules dissociate, and form a very rigid structure containing mostly hexagonal patters. [99,100] However, there is no explicit pH variation at the interface as protons and hydroxyls are trapped on the surface. [96] On oxide surfaces the situation is more complex.…”
Section: Microkineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 Hybrid methods, where the microsolvation is complemented by an implicit solvent are particularly attractive in terms of computational efficiency, but consistent treatment of the explicit water molecules remains a significant challenge. 9,[31][32][33][34] Another approach is based on ice-like structures, [35][36][37][38][39] which are motivated by low-temperature surface science studies which have evidenced the existence of these arrangements over many transition metal surfaces. [40][41][42] However, these rigid networks are unlikely to be representative at ambient temperature and even less so at the elevated temperatures applied, for instance, in aqueousphase reforming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) is due to the formation of hydrogen bonds between HCHO and the surface hydroxyls [57]. The energy difference can be estimated to the formation of two hydrogen bonds [58]. On (110), A2 binding energy is higher than I2 because the hydroxylated surface presents intrasurface hydrogen bonds (between O lat -H and another O lat ) and formaldehyde adsorbs on the acceptor oxygen disrupting the H-bond surface network.…”
Section: Dehydrogenation Of Formaldehyde To Carbon Monoxide On Ceomentioning
confidence: 99%