2023
DOI: 10.1080/02331934.2023.2171730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified scheme for scalarization in set optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obvious from Remarks 2.1 and 2.2 that the Bishop-Phelps functional φ ℓ and the Gerstewitz scalarizing functional ξ −C,k are −C representing functionals. In a recent paper by Ha [19], equality (3.1) is also called the cone representation property (P4), where ψ is named an abstract scalarizing function. + .…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obvious from Remarks 2.1 and 2.2 that the Bishop-Phelps functional φ ℓ and the Gerstewitz scalarizing functional ξ −C,k are −C representing functionals. In a recent paper by Ha [19], equality (3.1) is also called the cone representation property (P4), where ψ is named an abstract scalarizing function. + .…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that Bishop-Phelps cones have a lot of useful properties and there are interesting applications in variational analysis and nonconvex optimization (see Phelps [32]) as well as in vector optimization (see, e.g., Eichfelder [33], Eichfelder and Kasimbeyli [17], Ha [34], Ha and Jahn [35], [31], Jahn [36], [3, p. 159-160], Kasimbeyli [10], Kasimbeyli and Kasimbeyli [37]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] defined set order relations. One can see [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] for further works based on these order relations, including existence theorems for minimal elements, scalarizations, derivatives and optimality conditions etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%