2019
DOI: 10.1101/543330
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified rheological model for cells and cellularised materials

Abstract: The mechanical response of single cells and tissues exhibits a broad distribution of time scales that gives often rise to a distinctive power-law regime. Such complex behaviour cannot be easily captured by traditional rheological approaches, making material characterisation and predictive modelling very challenging. Here, we present a novel model combining conventional viscoelastic elements with fractional calculus that successfully captures the macroscopic relaxation response of epithelial monolayers. The par… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the growing evidence for active remodeling of junction mechanical properties (12,13), most theoretical models for epithelial mechanics, such as the vertex model (14)(15)(16), cellular Potts model (17,18), or continuum models (19)(20)(21), assume constant interfacial tensions and cell contractility. Although some recent models attempt to model junctional mechanics (9,(22)(23)(24)(25), these have not been directly tested in experiments at the scale of individual cell junctions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the growing evidence for active remodeling of junction mechanical properties (12,13), most theoretical models for epithelial mechanics, such as the vertex model (14)(15)(16), cellular Potts model (17,18), or continuum models (19)(20)(21), assume constant interfacial tensions and cell contractility. Although some recent models attempt to model junctional mechanics (9,(22)(23)(24)(25), these have not been directly tested in experiments at the scale of individual cell junctions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observed non-linearities may therefore be mainly associated with the cellular contribution. One caveat concerns the threshold stress values above which stress stiening is observed, of the order of 1Pa here, vs. 10 − 1000 Pa in single cells [47,53] and several hundreds Pa in monolayers [33,34]. However, the magnetic rheometer allows to exert comparatively small stresses, while most other techniques involve larger stresses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However the link between cellular and junctional contributions is not straightforward. The response of suspended epithelial cell monolayers has been characterized by combining conventional viscoelastic and fractional elements with an exponent close to 0.3 [33,34]. Plus power-law rheology has been observed at the organ scale in a shear rheometer [35,36] with an exponent close to 0.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mittag–Leffler function with one parameter has found its applications in the AB Model and in relaxation models that involves interpolation between exponential and power‐law behavior 50 . The data received from experimenting with models for cells and tissues is linked to the Wiman function 51 . Prabhakar function is associated with Havriliak–Negami relaxation 52 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%