2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2017.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified phase-field theory for the mechanics of damage and quasi-brittle failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
334
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 606 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
9
334
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a large literature devoted to the analysis of the robustness of quasi-Newton methods when dealing with non-convex minimization problems -see, e.g., [27][28][29] and references therein. Very recently, Wu et al [30] showed the potential of quasi-Newton monolithic approaches in the context of the so-called unified phase field damage theory, a phase field regularisation of cohesive zone models (PF-CZM) [31,32]. We extend their analysis to the standard phase field fracture formulation and showcase the potential of the method in three problems of different nature: quasi-static fracture, phase field fatigue and dynamic fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There is a large literature devoted to the analysis of the robustness of quasi-Newton methods when dealing with non-convex minimization problems -see, e.g., [27][28][29] and references therein. Very recently, Wu et al [30] showed the potential of quasi-Newton monolithic approaches in the context of the so-called unified phase field damage theory, a phase field regularisation of cohesive zone models (PF-CZM) [31,32]. We extend their analysis to the standard phase field fracture formulation and showcase the potential of the method in three problems of different nature: quasi-static fracture, phase field fatigue and dynamic fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…One of the main ingredients for the outstanding progresses on phase field methods stems from the fact that this variational approach does offer very appealing aspects and can easily be implemented into multi-field finite element frameworks. In view of the strong potential of the phase field methods, recent developments encompassed its application to cohesive-like fracture (Verhoosel and de Borst, 2013), coupled damage-plasticity (Ambati et al, 2015;Miehe et al, 2015aMiehe et al, , 2016, shells (Miehe et al, 2014;Areias et al, 2016;Reinoso et al, 2017b), thermo-elastic (Miehe et al, 2015b) and hydrogen embrittlement (Martínez-Pañeda et al, 2018) applications, defining alternative degradation functions (Wu, 2017;Sargado et al, 2017), among many others. Owing to its modular formulation, the phase-field approach to fracture has proven to be a powerful tool for fracture characterization of many different materials such as arterial walls (Gültekin et al, 2018), and anisotropic media (Teichtmeister et al, 2017;Bleyer and Alessi, 2018;Quintanas-Corominas et al, 2019), to quote a few of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the phase field approach, the initiation and evolution of cracks emerges by solving the partial differential equations of the model, representing its striking feature, which results in a significant simplification of the implementation, especially in 3-D problems. Different versions of the phase field model have been developed and, more importantly, they can be used to model very complex, multiple crack fronts, branching in both 2D and 3D without ad-hoc numerical treatments, i.e., without fracture criteria ( [31,5,27,34,41,13,50,22,69,21]). However, the application of phase field models to study fracture problems in layered media is rather rare in the literature and still open problem.…”
Section: Approach and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%