2012
DOI: 10.1080/10556788.2011.593624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified numerical scheme for linear-quadratic optimal control problems with joint control and state constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second part of Lemma 4 presents a method to achieve the aforementioned goal. The second part of Lemma 4 states that the optimal solution of QP ( 17) is unique and Lipschitz continuous in the RHS parameter w ∈ R a 1 + , and this result follows directly from proposition 4.1.d of Han et al (2012). A direct consequence of the second part of Lemma 4 is the following Lipschitz continuity result.…”
Section: Asymptotic Lower Boundmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The second part of Lemma 4 presents a method to achieve the aforementioned goal. The second part of Lemma 4 states that the optimal solution of QP ( 17) is unique and Lipschitz continuous in the RHS parameter w ∈ R a 1 + , and this result follows directly from proposition 4.1.d of Han et al (2012). A direct consequence of the second part of Lemma 4 is the following Lipschitz continuity result.…”
Section: Asymptotic Lower Boundmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The general direct method approach to solving optimal control problems of convex. This is in contrast to the convex cost case where convergence to the true solution can be shown, for different direct solution methods [33][34][35][36][37][38]. We also note however that no general convergence proof for direct collocation methods of solving constrained optimal control problems exists in the literature.…”
Section: Effect Of Direct Transcription Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The optimisation problem that we address for (12) regards the minimization of the difference between the output voltage v(t) and a target periodic trajectory v r (t). Since, in practice, the inverter is controlled acting on the H-bridge switches, the problem can be tackled using two alternative approaches, as observed in [23].…”
Section: Optimisation Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to [5], in addition to the reference voltage v r on the capacitor, we define a corresponding reference current i r = C vr and we define the state of the system as x = [i − i r , v − v r ] T . Rewriting (12) in terms of x leads to a linear model of the form (1), with the following definitions for the system matrix, the input matrix and the excitation signal:…”
Section: Optimisation Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation