2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified method of design for fatigue crack growth resistance in structural materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final part of the tests was run at constant load (95% of the maximum load reached during the second part to the test) at a cyclic frequency of 5 Hz to obtain data in Region III of fast crack growth. The generated FCG data were analyzed, and fracture toughness values were obtained using Fracture Technology Associates' automated analysis software [37]. Closure evaluations were done using the adjusted compliance ratio (ACR) technique [38,39].…”
Section: Fatigue Crack Growth Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final part of the tests was run at constant load (95% of the maximum load reached during the second part to the test) at a cyclic frequency of 5 Hz to obtain data in Region III of fast crack growth. The generated FCG data were analyzed, and fracture toughness values were obtained using Fracture Technology Associates' automated analysis software [37]. Closure evaluations were done using the adjusted compliance ratio (ACR) technique [38,39].…”
Section: Fatigue Crack Growth Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cracks are categorised based on the relationship between their dimensions, as shown in Fig. 1, such as length (a) and width (w), length of shielding zone (l s ), characteristic microstructural size (m s ) and the plastic zone radius (r p ) [23,[28][29][30][31]. A physically small crack (hereafter referred as small crack) is defined as a crack of length in the range between 20 µm and 1 mm [24] and is generally smaller than the typical non-destructive testing (NDT) detection limit (< 1 mm) [29,[32][33][34].…”
Section: Small Crack Growth Behaviour and Modified Nasgro Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective one -different from the original and modified plasticity induced crack closure formulation (e.g. Donald and Paris 1999;Cui et al 2011;Gavras et al 2013) -can be determined taking the log-relative contributions into account: ΔK e = (ΔK)…”
Section: Crack Tip Stress Intensity Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%