2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.114802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified level set method for simulating mixed granular flows involving multiple non-spherical DEM models in complex structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This introduces certain roughness to the deformable bodies' surface and can be avoided by using mathematically well-defined geometric objects (e.g., curved walls [42]), mapped from the finite element. Other shape representations, including signed distance functions [60], level set methods [42,61,62], and Minkowski sums [63] could also be used. Secondly, currently, only the traction due to particle-wall interaction forces are mapped onto the finite elements; the kinetic traction due to velocity fluctuations is not explicitly considered.…”
Section: Outlooksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This introduces certain roughness to the deformable bodies' surface and can be avoided by using mathematically well-defined geometric objects (e.g., curved walls [42]), mapped from the finite element. Other shape representations, including signed distance functions [60], level set methods [42,61,62], and Minkowski sums [63] could also be used. Secondly, currently, only the traction due to particle-wall interaction forces are mapped onto the finite elements; the kinetic traction due to velocity fluctuations is not explicitly considered.…”
Section: Outlooksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real particle geometries can be simplified, for instance, by spheres [1], ellipsoids [2], polyhedral [3], cluster/clump of spheres [4], level set functions [5] and non-uniform rational Bsplines (NURBS) [6,7]. A compatible contact model must be used for each geometry [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%