2010
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2010.2060930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Unified Framework for Uncertainty, Compatibility Analysis, and Data Fusion for Multi-Stereo 3-D Shape Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was chosen instead of a multi-stereo approach that can provide a better accuracy, if uncertainty is properly estimated as in [6,7]. Differently, multi-camera provides smoother points trajectories while multi-stereo reconstruction tends to generate marker "jumps" from one stereo pair to another, which ends up with also a jump in the corresponding 3D position.…”
Section: Image Processing For Shape Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was chosen instead of a multi-stereo approach that can provide a better accuracy, if uncertainty is properly estimated as in [6,7]. Differently, multi-camera provides smoother points trajectories while multi-stereo reconstruction tends to generate marker "jumps" from one stereo pair to another, which ends up with also a jump in the corresponding 3D position.…”
Section: Image Processing For Shape Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The related software manages 12 cameras, connected in a configuration of 6 stereo-pairs. The camera model parameters are estimated through camera calibration and an accurate description of this stage can be found in (De Cecco et al, 2009). Figure 2 shows the 3D reconstruction for the first and last frame acquired from the system for an eight frame long sequence.…”
Section: Image Acquisition and 3d Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although more computation is needed we believe this method is more robust when dealing with high curvature objects and when the lighting conditions are not optimal (White et al, 2007). Each stereo pair provides the depth evaluation of each point in the field of view; a compatibility analysis between points reconstructed from more than one stereo pair is performed by using Mahalanobis distance and the fusion of compatible points is performed employing a Bayesian approach (De Cecco et al, 2009). The output of the 3D reconstruction stage is a n 脳 5 matrix M for each frame such that:…”
Section: Image Acquisition and 3d Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a follow-up to the VDI standard is not considered here either. De Cecco et al [ 28 ] present an uncertainty analysis for the reconstruction of a 3D object. Three stages are defined, multi-stereo, multi-camera, and individual stereo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%